Comments on: CSS Z-Index Can’t Have Negative Values In Firefox http://www.slicksurface.com/blog/2007-04/css-z-index-cant-have-negative-values-in-firefox Observations about technology, design, and search engine optimization by the staff of Slicksurface LLC - a design and technology company located in New York. Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:59:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: scape http://www.slicksurface.com/blog/2007-04/css-z-index-cant-have-negative-values-in-firefox#comment-51 scape Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:47:32 +0000 http://new.slicksurface.com/blog/?p=9#comment-51 nor does it take 0 in, which makes no sense to me as 0 is the basis of all integer variables in any computer language I have used... nor does it take 0 in, which makes no sense to me as 0 is the basis of all integer variables in any computer language I have used…

]]> By: Mike http://www.slicksurface.com/blog/2007-04/css-z-index-cant-have-negative-values-in-firefox#comment-48 Mike Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:44:22 +0000 http://new.slicksurface.com/blog/?p=9#comment-48 You're right, Still in 2.0.0.12 firefox doesn't take a negative value for z-order. Maybe it is on the CSS specs, but I don't know yet. Thanks. You’re right,

Still in 2.0.0.12 firefox doesn’t take a negative value for z-order. Maybe it is on the CSS specs, but I don’t know yet.

Thanks.

]]> By: Xay http://www.slicksurface.com/blog/2007-04/css-z-index-cant-have-negative-values-in-firefox#comment-13 Xay Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:17:00 +0000 http://new.slicksurface.com/blog/?p=9#comment-13 Even if it stacks below other elements, transparency would allow us to see the lower element. but it is as if Gecko doesn't draw the element at all. Even if it stacks below other elements, transparency would allow us to see the lower element. but it is as if Gecko doesn’t draw the element at all.

]]> By: Ryan http://www.slicksurface.com/blog/2007-04/css-z-index-cant-have-negative-values-in-firefox#comment-12 Ryan Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:31:00 +0000 http://new.slicksurface.com/blog/?p=9#comment-12 Yeah, I spent 1 hour trying to figure out why my images weren't showing up. Apparently only use positive z-indexes. lol Yeah, I spent 1 hour trying to figure out why my images weren’t showing up. Apparently only use positive z-indexes. lol

]]> By: Andy http://www.slicksurface.com/blog/2007-04/css-z-index-cant-have-negative-values-in-firefox#comment-11 Andy Wed, 30 May 2007 11:53:00 +0000 http://new.slicksurface.com/blog/?p=9#comment-11 Well it's not so much a bug as a different interpretation of standards. If you give your body a z-index it will become a stacking context; your z-index=-1 divs will then hopfully appear in it as you expected. Well it’s not so much a bug as a different interpretation of standards. If you give your body a z-index it will become a stacking context; your z-index=-1 divs will then hopfully appear in it as you expected.

]]> By: Asa http://www.slicksurface.com/blog/2007-04/css-z-index-cant-have-negative-values-in-firefox#comment-2 Asa Sat, 07 Apr 2007 01:35:00 +0000 http://new.slicksurface.com/blog/?p=9#comment-2 This is a bug in Gecko and is already fixed in what will become Firefox 3. It will not be fixed in Firefox 2. <br/><br/>More information is available at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78087<br/><br/>- A This is a bug in Gecko and is already fixed in what will become Firefox 3. It will not be fixed in Firefox 2.

More information is available at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78087

- A

]]>