<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 4D Summit 2007 Keynote Address by Brendan Coveney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slicksurface.com/blog/2007-10/4d-summit-2007-keynote-address-by-brendan-coveney/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slicksurface.com/blog/2007-10/4d-summit-2007-keynote-address-by-brendan-coveney</link>
	<description>Observations about technology, design, and search engine optimization by the staff of Slicksurface LLC - a design and technology company located in New York.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Julio Carneiro</title>
		<link>http://www.slicksurface.com/blog/2007-10/4d-summit-2007-keynote-address-by-brendan-coveney#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Julio Carneiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 04:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.slicksurface.com/blog/?p=88#comment-21</guid>
		<description>LR mentioned that as server can now be remotely administered, a linux version is more likely to happen. no promises though.&lt;br/&gt;Also on the multiple databases server. There was no mention of that at all.&lt;br/&gt;During the Q&#038;A I got the impression (from some exchanges between LR and L.Esnault) that Server is still not cast in stone at all... so we may take awhile for the first beta to show up...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LR mentioned that as server can now be remotely administered, a linux version is more likely to happen. no promises though.<br />Also on the multiple databases server. There was no mention of that at all.<br />During the Q&#038;A I got the impression (from some exchanges between LR and L.Esnault) that Server is still not cast in stone at all&#8230; so we may take awhile for the first beta to show up&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Harper</title>
		<link>http://www.slicksurface.com/blog/2007-10/4d-summit-2007-keynote-address-by-brendan-coveney#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Harper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.slicksurface.com/blog/?p=88#comment-20</guid>
		<description>I don't know whether 4D Server will run "faceless", but anything you can do on the server you can do remotely. In other words, I suspect (don't know for sure) that whatever you use to get an interface for the server on the server is pretty much the same as you'd use remotely.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The bottom line is you don't need remote access software (Timbuktu, RemotelyAnywhere, etc.) to administer 4D Server v11 - there will be 4D software that you can use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know whether 4D Server will run &#8220;faceless&#8221;, but anything you can do on the server you can do remotely. In other words, I suspect (don&#8217;t know for sure) that whatever you use to get an interface for the server on the server is pretty much the same as you&#8217;d use remotely.</p>
<p>The bottom line is you don&#8217;t need remote access software (Timbuktu, RemotelyAnywhere, etc.) to administer 4D Server v11 - there will be 4D software that you can use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thinkx</title>
		<link>http://www.slicksurface.com/blog/2007-10/4d-summit-2007-keynote-address-by-brendan-coveney#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>thinkx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.slicksurface.com/blog/?p=88#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Any comments on whether 4D Server will run face-less, and be able to host multiple databases, instead of the current one-instance-per-database setup?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any comments on whether 4D Server will run face-less, and be able to host multiple databases, instead of the current one-instance-per-database setup?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
